Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
ImpunityNews

40-thousand-TL compensation for tear gas attack during protest for Soma

by mustafa 16/01/2020
16/01/2020 414 views

The Constitutional Court (AYM) announced the reasoned decree on the application of Sıla Koç and Betül Öztürk Gülhan, who were exposed to close-range tear gas in their faces during the police intervention against the protest organised on the mass work murder in Soma. The court decided that the “ban of treatment against human dignity” was violated both materially and procedurally, as well as a violation of “the right to meeting and demonstration,” issuing 20 thousand TL compensation each to be paid for Koç and Gülhan. The Constitutional Court expressed that camera recordings on the incident were not submitted by the police to the Prosecutor’s Office and that the Prosecutor’s Office therefore didn’t research on the camera recordings; indicating that the Prosecutor’s Office left necessary steps to illuminate the reason for the incident and didn’t conduct the investigation with care.

 

16.01.2020

 

bianet.org

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Wikipedia free after 2 years and 8 months
Sonraki Post
Acquittal verdict in lawsuit against trustee protest

You May Also Like

The Serious Restrictions Placed On The Right To...

07/03/2023

Turkey’s Freedom of Expression and Thought Agenda (December...

23/12/2022

Turkey’s Freedom of Expression and Thought Agenda (December...

13/12/2022

Turkey’s Freedom of Expression and Thought Agenda (November...

06/12/2022

Turkey’s Freedom of Expression and Thought Agenda (November...

29/11/2022

Turkey’s State of “Impunity” – 2022

15/11/2022

Lawsuit against journalist Mehmet Arslan

01/04/2022

Investigation against protest on “survival”

01/04/2022

Two detained during olive tree cutting

01/04/2022

First hearing held in Istanbul Pride Parade Case

31/03/2022

30-thousand-TL compensation against Çiğdem Toker

31/03/2022

Lawsuit against Chamber of Architects executives

31/03/2022

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net