Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
ImpunityNews

European Court of Human Rights denies application on Roboski Massacre

by Dusun-Think 17/05/2018
17/05/2018 498 views

European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) did not accept the application on Roboski Massacre, causing the deaths of 34 people, 19 of them children, after the bombardment of Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) aircraft. The court’s reason for denial was the previous denial of the supreme court due to the deficient documents in the application, which were not compensated in time.

 

The verdict was announced by lawyer Kerem Altıparmak, who is also among the applicants, on Twitter. “The European Court of Human Rights buried the Roboski massacre in history. The name of the court must now be changed into European Court of Nonacceptance, because that’s the best they can do!… 34 people were massacred, together with children, nothing was done for seven years. Now those seven years was forgotten, the application was denied because the lawyers were a couple days late. I can not find words to speak,” wrote Altıparmak.

 

The application made at the Constitutional Court has previously been denied on 24 February 2015 due to “the identified deficiencies in the case file not being compensated in time.” The European Court of Human Rights evaluated this denial as the “lack of exhaustion of domestic remedies.”

 

17.05.2018

 

gazeteduvar.com.tr

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Student club activities prevented at Istanbul Technical University
Sonraki Post
Freedom of expression picture in 16 years: 23 thousand years imprisonment against 7,588

You May Also Like

Turkey’s Freedom of Expression and Thought Agenda (December...

23/12/2022

Turkey’s Freedom of Expression and Thought Agenda (December...

13/12/2022

Turkey’s Freedom of Expression and Thought Agenda (November...

06/12/2022

Turkey’s Freedom of Expression and Thought Agenda (November...

29/11/2022

Turkey’s State of “Impunity” – 2022

15/11/2022

Lawsuit against journalist Mehmet Arslan

01/04/2022

Investigation against protest on “survival”

01/04/2022

Two detained during olive tree cutting

01/04/2022

First hearing held in Istanbul Pride Parade Case

31/03/2022

30-thousand-TL compensation against Çiğdem Toker

31/03/2022

Lawsuit against Chamber of Architects executives

31/03/2022

Imprisonment sentence against writer Yavuz Ekinci

31/03/2022

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net